Papers of the day   All papers

Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic

Comments

Ludo Waltman: We have performed a large-scale comparison of five major bibliographic data sources, focusing on their coverage and the quality of citation links: @Scopus, @webofscience, @DSDimensions, @CrossrefOrg and @MSFTAcademic https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10732 @martijnsvisser @neesjanvaneck https://t.co/68ygh1weaa

4 replies, 202 likes


Ludo Waltman: Our work on comparing bibliographic data sources has received quite a lot of attention; we have just published a blog post answering a number of questions about this work https://leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/comparing-bibliographic-data-sources-q-a @martijnsvisser @neesjanvaneck @LeidenMadtrics

0 replies, 41 likes


CWTS Leiden: Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. New pre-print by @martijnsvisser, @neesjanvaneck and @LudoWaltman https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10732

1 replies, 38 likes


Reddit Open Science: Studie on Scopus, WoS, Dimensions, Crossref (OpenCitations), and Microsoft Academic. Overlap, coverage, completeness and accuracy of citation links. Microsoft Academic provides the most comprehensive coverage. https://www.reddit.com/r/Open_Science/comments/gpn38c/studie_on_scopus_wos_dimensions_crossref/?utm_source=ifttt https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10732

1 replies, 9 likes


martijn wiarda: Working with bibliographic data sources? Definitely consider the comprehensiveness and selectivity differences between Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Very interesting read.

0 replies, 8 likes


HotComputerScience: Most popular computer science paper of the day: "Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic" https://hotcomputerscience.com/paper/large-scale-comparison-of-bibliographic-data-sources-scopus-web-of-science-dimensions-crossref-and-microsoft-academic https://twitter.com/LudoWaltman/status/1263704823754625025

0 replies, 7 likes


Dean Giustini: Congrats "Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources" @Scopus vs. @webofscience @DSDimensions @CrossrefOrg @MSFTAcademic by @martijnsvisser @neesjanvaneck et al I recall old days when #Scirus clearly reported its crawled content saving us time https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10732 https://t.co/GPIkN7bd8e

0 replies, 1 likes


Vivek Singh: Nice read. Interesting and comprehensive. @Singh_Prashasti @Mousumi2212 @SKBanshal @Philipp_Mayr @jleta

0 replies, 1 likes


Content

Found on May 22 2020 at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.10732.pdf

PDF content of a computer science paper: Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic